Joao Carlos Correia
Universidade da Beira Interior
jcorreia@ubi.pt
Working with nationalism as ideology
The context: nationalism and Salazar
were two main factors that shaped Portugal between the process of
European unification after the Second World War 1945 and the democratic
revolution of 1974: the dictatorial nature of Salazar's regime and its
strong reluctance to any kind of decolonization (Pinto and Teixeira,
2004). After the abolition of the monarchy and the Portuguese
participation in First World War on the side of the Allies, the country
experienced a period of cabinet instability and pro-authoritarian
activity that aggravated the young republic's legitimacy crisis. A coup
d'état in 1926 led to the establishment of a military dictatorship
that was internally divided as a consequence of the conflicts that
existed within the conservative bloc among supporters of the monarchy,
partisans of a moderate right-wing republic, supporters of the
Catholic Centre, and real fascists. Stability was restored within the
dictatorship when Salazar, a young professor from the Democratic
Christian Academic Centre, finally rose to Prime Minister in 1932,
assuming the country's leadership (Oliveira Marques, 1986: 363-372).
While the New State (`Estado Novo') was
inspired by European fascism, its political institutions, which were
created in 1933, were primarily influenced by corporatist ideals that
resulted in the institutionalization of a dictatorial regime supported
by a single party (Oliveira Marques, 1986: 465-467).
Facing a difficult
financial situation, the new Prime Minister tried to solve it with
tried and tested
authoritarian policies:
the dissolution of Parliament, parties' interdiction, introduction of
`strong Government', with severe restrictions on the freedom of the
press, movement and assembly.
Following the Second World War, the
Allies didn't extend to
Portugal the same policy applied to its
Spanish neighbour (Pinto, 2002).
The country was still
quite isolated at the international level, except for its presence at
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Pinto, 2002: 2,
7). Salazar's neutrality during the Second
World War, and the rise of the Cold War, ensured the survival of his
regime in the post-1945 international environment. Portugal joined
the United Nations after an initial opposition (Pinto & Teixeira,
2004: 113).
The Salazar regime survived by cultivating an external image of benign
authoritarianism that was an anti-communist bulwark of Western
civilization, and by efficiently controlling internal opposition (Pinto
and Teixeira, 2004: 113). Salazar saw the relationship between Europe
and Africa as a complementary one, and viewed the connections between
Europe and Africa as a harmony of economic, political and military
plans.
The breakdown of the authoritarian nationalism
During the Salazar Regime, and especially
during the colonial war, most Portuguese were educated to respect the
values of Nation and Authority. The newspapers had to send their pages
to Censorship Services before publication;
radio broadcasts were only allowed if they
spread the ideology of National Revolution;
and Portuguese public TV, established during the dictatorship, was used
by the State as a tool for the `moral elevation' of the Portuguese
people. Before the Democratic Revolution, most of the commemorations of
the National Day of Portugal (which Salazar referred to as
Dia da Raça, or Race Day) were filled with the
awarding of medals to wounded warriors of the colonial war, broadcast
live on TV. Isolated from Europe during the fascist regime, the
Portuguese elites were educated to imagine Portugal as a multi-racial
society, having Lisbon as a culturally and racially homogeneous
capital.
The arrival of democracy was mostly provoked
by the increasing opposition of the Army to the unfinished colonial
war, fought since 1961. After the 1974 Revolution, Portugal opened
negotiations almost instantaneously with national liberation movements
from the colonies. In
contrast to past configurations of the image of `the Portuguese'
(white, Latin, Catholic, believers in the Holy Virgin of Fátima,
inhabitants of a old Empire with an important presence in Africa and in
some parts of Asia), the decolonization process brought the arrival
from more than 200,000 survivors of the subsequent civil wars in
Angola, Mozambique and Guinea. These survivors were frequently full of
prejudice against democracy and nostalgic of the Portuguese colonial
past. From the political centre of a transcontinental Colonial Empire,
Portugal became a small country integrated in a far larger economic and
political block. The ideological use of the concept of Nation, to
confer legitimacy to the Empire through the invocation of a historical
mission, was challenged by democratic events and by an economic
development that had as its model the bourgeois societies of Central
Europe.
During the 1990s, the rekindling of nationalism in Portugal was helped when a
relatively recent Democratic Party, the Democratic Renovation Party
(PRD), lost parliamentary representation, beginning its decay,
accumulation of debt and eventual collapse. With no connection to any
traditional European political - ideological family, PRD can be viewed
as an epiphenomenon, whose meteoric rise was achieved through
accumulating protest votes against the austere policies of the leading
political parties - the PS (socialist) and the PSD
(social-democratic). Without classical ideological references, or
strong sociological roots, the Party followed an unavoidable path to
decline. Following this decline, elements from ancient National Action
(extreme-right wing) paid the Party's debts and changed its name to
the National Renovation Party. Right-wing extreme nationalism had
arrived in Portugal again, and for the first time since 25th April, the
date of the Democratic `Carnation Revolution'. During some subsequent
public events concerned with immigration, the National Renovation Party
became an active political actor trying to take advantage of a certain
hostile mood towards immigrants, particularly those coming from Africa
and Brazil.
Theoretical approaches towards media
Ideological and political phenomena in
contemporary democratic societies need to obtain recognition and some
kind of visibility from media. Some interesting phenomena converging
with punctual demonstration of xenophobic nationalism were not possible
without media intervention. Having in mind
this, we must understand some problems concerned with the so called
effects theory, the name generally given to
a considerable amount of research effort devoted to assessing the
influence of the mass media on attitudes and opinions (Hartman and
Husband, 1973: 271).
The first era of the effects theory was
influenced by a view of people as atomised
units of "mass society", whose stimulus-response psychology was
seen as responding in a straightforward way to the stimulus of message.
That tradition was characterized by a search for direct and
short-term effects and, from this perspective, the effects were first
seen as very strong. Propaganda, according to this point of view,
achieves its goals through a theoretical formulation that became known
as `the magic bullet' - that is to say, a bullet of high precision
that never missed its target.
In a second stage of research, there emerged
an approach generally conceived as a limited
effects paradigm, which established a form of orthodoxy in place until
the 1960s. According to this approach, the
media are ordinarily viewed as a
necessary but not a
sufficient cause of audience effects, acting as part of a nexus of mediating
factors and influences. The effects of media must take into account the
original predispositions of audiences. Of the
three types of effects identified -
reinforcement, modification and conversion
- the reinforcement of pre-existing attitudes was the most
frequently observed effect. Finally, this kind of approach emphasised
the effects of small groups and of opinion leaders (Klapper, 1960:
15-31). But still, these particular
analyses of the media were concerned with
short-term effects, relevant to some particular circumstances, such
as electoral or advertising campaigns
Finally, the social
influence of the mass media began to be analysed by more sophisticated
approaches coming from varied paradigms: cultural studies,
phenomenological approaches, sociology of culture and even from
empirical sociology, alongside contribution from researchers within the
traditional effects theory who were, by now, much more concerned with
culturalist and
cognitive dimensions. There are good reasons for this continued
interest in research in the effects tradition. In first place, the
nature of mass media the kind of ideologies that they generate,
together with simple physical limitation of time and space and the need
to attract readers and viewers, impose constraints both on what events
make the news and on the kind of treatment they receive.
Second, Western cultural
heritage and tradition contain elements
which act to classify other races and ethnic groups. The media operate
within such cultures and so are obliged to use cultural symbols. The
prevalence of images and stereotypes, derived from the colonial
experience and at least implicitly derogatory to other ethnic groups
and races, are visible in jokes, fears and small talk.
Finally, we have
the news values:
the criteria that define which events will
be chosen to become news. One feature that
makes events more newsworthy is their
ability to be interpreted within a familiar framework or in terms of
existing images, stereotypes and expectations. Arguably, the key to a
more accurate understanding of the role of the mass media is to accept
the existence of a continuous interplay between events, cultural
meanings and news frameworks.
This article will now be oriented to
research hypotheses concerned with discourse
and cognition, drawing on two main bodies of thought: first, theories
of the social construction of reality, specifically oriented to the
study of frames; and the critical analysis of discourse, a body of work
that analyses the connections between racism and media - adopting,
however, strong premises from the cognitive approach.
Socio-cognitive approach: typification and frame analysis
The distinctive feature of a socio-cognitive
approach is the belief that our knowledge of reality is a mental
construct, a product from everyday life intersubjective experience.
Social dynamics are not perceived in themselves; they cannot be
perceived without meaning attributed to
them. Above all, Alfred Schutz has analysed
social experience from a Husserlian point of view and draws a strong
attempt to demonstrate that intentional (object-directed)
consciousness is the basis of our experiences of the everyday
Life-World. All the work of Schutz is explicitly directed towards
clarifying the concept of subjective meaning - a task that, in
Schutz's eyes, remained unfinished in Weber's work.
His approach is particularly central to very important traditions in
Western thought - micro-sociology and frame analysis. Both are
supported by the phenomenology of the social world of Alfred Schutz,
the later developments from Berger and Luckmann and applied to the
media by Tuchman, Gitlin, Cohen and others. Although these theories can
be viewed critically given their absence of references to power and
domination, they can be used to look closely to the everyday work of
belief, attitudes and knowledge building.
This tradition maintains
that in the everyday life-world there is a
level of common sense thought, where people accept typifications as a
resource, constructing socially shared objective meanings to avoid
uncertainty (Correia: 2005: 38-39).
People, in everyday life, suspend their doubts in order to turn their
world into a safer one (Schutz, 1976). Such an attitude assumes a
reliable premise in the permanence of the structures of the world: one
trusts that the world will remain as it has been known up until now.
Thus, experience will continue to preserve its basic validity (Schutz
and Luckmann, 1973:7). The familiarity with social reality implies an
organized standard of routine (Schutz, 1976: 108) learned from the
knowledge of "prescriptions" and typical behaviours (Schutz, 1975:
94-95).
`Common sense perceptions' are perceptions on the basis of types. These
are constructed out of socially available stock of knowledge at hand
and they are applied in the actual interpretative process of daily life
on the basis of practical purposes of the social actor. As Tuchman,
closely following the concepts of Schutz, correctly reminds us:
"temporal planning characterizes social action as project. That is,
social action is carried out in the future perfect tense. Action is
cast into the future in order to accomplish acts that will happened,
should everything go as anticipated" (Tuchman, 1978: 41).
From this perspective, the use of
typifications appears as an
a priori component of a social reality. The
construction of typifications is a kind of crystallization of the
experience that allows stability, preserving some characteristics and
providing the basis for the solution of practical tasks presented to
social agents. In face of each new situation, the actor will look for
similar past events, and so s/he will act in a similar way as before,
following the principle that things will remain
identical. Whereas stereotypes have to be
maintained by ignorance, typifications arise from familiarity and
extensive knowledge of the typified actor or action.
The notion of typification has known an
extensive development in ethnomethodological research, especially in
what concerns the sociology of professional ideologies. In the domain
of Journalism Theory, Gaye Tuchman shows how
everyday news work can be seen as a question of "routinizing the
unexpected." As part of the process of routinisation, journalists make
use of different news categories and typifications in order to reduce
the contingency of news work. "Newsworkers
use typifications to transform the idiosyncratic occurrences of the
everyday world into raw materials that can be subjected to routine
processing and dissemination" (Tuchman, 1978: 50).
In journalism, everyday practice develops a
set of procedures to assure the coverage of a well-defined subject.
This set of procedures implies the learning on accumulated experience,
to allow for stability in what concerns the approach for similar
events. The routines and typifications are established standards of
behaviour, procedures that, without great risk or complications, assure
that journalists, under the pressure of time, can rapidly transform the
event into a news story (Traquina, 1993:32 - 33).
Typifications are different from categories. While the later refers to
the classification of objects according to one or more relevant
characteristics ruled salient by classifiers in a process of formal
analysis, typifications refer to the performance of practical tasks,
being constituted and grounded in everyday activity (Tuchman, 1978:
50). As typifications are parts of the professional stock of knowledge,
being a professional reporter capable of dealing with idiosyncratic
occurrences means being able to use adequate typifications. The problem
is that typifications are seductive; they are, in some way, artificial
constructs, that may lead reporters to apply stereotypes, easy
simplifications and incorrect labels.
Frames and typifications
The cognitive notion of frame appears,
generally, as a set of presuppositions or evaluative criteria within
which a person's perception of a particular subject seem to occur.
The notion has been expounded by a great
number of disciplines: from the psychology of perception and Gestalt
theory, including the well-known experiments with figure-ground
pictures, such as the example of the two faces and a vase; from
linguistics, where the Sapir/Whorf hypothesis maintains that linguistic
structures and the terminology available to us constitute frames of
reference which direct our attention to certain aspects of the world
whilst hiding others
(Whorf
1, 1956); from social psychology, where stereotyping and prejudice have
been regarded as cognitive processes in which all members of a given
class of objects or people are treated as equivalent (Lippman, 2002:
28-29); from Communication Theory (Bateson, 2000; Goffman, 1986) and,
also, from ethnomethodology's development of Schutzian
"typifications".
To Bateson, the frame concept is rooted in the study of communicative
interaction. Bateson introduced the notion of a frame as a
meta-communicative device that gives to the receiver instructions or
aids in its attempt to understand the messages included within the
frame. He showed that interaction always involves interpretative
frameworks by which participants define how others'
actions and words should be understood. Bateson presents frames with
the help from analogies: the physical analogy from the picture frame,
and the more abstract analogy of a mathematical set. Frames are
simultaneously including and exclusive devices, because including
certain messages and meaningful actions excludes others. So, the frame
is a kind of message intended to order or to organize the perception of
the viewer, saying: "Attend to what is within and do not attend to
what is outside". Hence, frames imply an orientation to reality
somewhat similar with the Gestalt psychology: we must to attend figure
and ground, emphasising the perception of the first one, and positively
inhibiting the second one (Bateson, 2000: 177-193; 184-188;
190-192).
Twenty years later, frame analysis was
introduced to sociological research by Goffman to refer to
mental constructions that allow its users to
locate, perceive, identify and label a seemingly infinite numbers of
concrete occurrences (Goffman, 1986: 21). According to Berger's
Foreword "The Frame in frame analysis refers to this inevitable
relational dimension of meaning. A frame, in this sense, is only a
particular tangible metaphor for what other sociologists have tried to
invoke by words like `background', `setting', `context', or a phrase
like `in terms of'. These all attempt to convey that what goes on
interaction is governed by usually unstated rules or principles more or
less implicitly set by the character of some large, tough perhaps
invisible, entity, (for example, the definitions of situation) within
which the interaction occurs" (p.xiii).
This set of unstated rules or principles was,
in Goffman's words, very similar to the sense used by Bateson (Goffman,
1986: 7). So, frames are, more or less, basic elements which govern
social events and our subjective involvement in them (Goffman, 1986:
10). In Journalism Theory, frames have also
made a strong appearance as cognitive elements structuring which parts
of reality become noticed. Todd Gitlin is responsible for a widely
quoted elaboration of the concept: "Frames are principles of
selection, emphasis and presentation
composed of little tacit theories about what exists, what happens, and
what matters" (Gitlin, 1980: 6). While Frames, are principles of
organization which govern social events and the subjective involvement
of the social actor, the strip is "an arbitrary slice or cut from the
stream of ongoing activity" (Goffmann, 1986, 10-11). Frames turn
unrecognizable happenings into a discernible event. They allow us to
see the figure against the ground. Typifications are related to frames
but in a more practical way, telling us how to act in front of a
recognizable and already framed event. While frames help us to evaluate
a situation, typifications are more connected with a stock of practical
knowledge, very similar to receipts. Finally, all those concepts are
commonly regarded as intersubjective constructs, built in everyday
common life by common man, in order to rule its practical purposes
within the world.
The limits of the microsociological approach are the absence of one
methodological tool at the level of discourse and, sometimes, but not
always, a kind of dismissal of problems concerned with power and
domination. As Tuchman (1978: 195) put it, Goffman is not interested in
the institutional mechanisms that are related with the organization of
experience. However, I think that some of these problems can be faced
by, at least, some suggestions coming from the critical analysis of
discourse.
Critical Discourse Analysis
The so-called linguist turn has had a clear influence on many theories
concerned with journalism and mediated communication. Critical
Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a perspective that refuses neutrality from
research and researcher, defining its goals in political, social and
cultural terms, looking to language as social practice (Maria Emília
Pedro, 1997: 15). So, CDA pays much attention to social phenomena such
as social power and domination, discrimination, racism, xenophobia and
so on. The authors engaged with this approach believe that phenomena
such as representation of power and reproduction of domination can be
understood through studying some characteristics of texts such as
vocabulary and metaphors, micro-structures and schemata strategies,
grammatical features, implications and presuppositions, politeness
conventions, or style (Pedro, 1997: 34-35).
However, there is not a necessary rupture with
a cognitive approach. The critical enterprise doesn't mean to embrace a
determinist point of view where all psychological dimensions of social
and discursive practices were ignored, to focus only on the discursive
level, acting as a mirror of the systemic and institutional level. Teun
van Dijk - the most remarkable representative author of this
approach, which seems to sustain a more emphatic concern with cognitive
dimensions of social practices - explicitly and significantly
supports the purposes of Tuchman in very precise terms:
"Her book, perhaps the most interesting and
innovating sociological study of news production, takes an
ethnomethodological approach. (....) such routines are described as
everyday accomplishments of reconstructing reality as news and, at the
same time, as enactments of the institutional processes in which
newsmaking takes place. News is not characterized as a picture of
reality, which may be correct or biased, but as a frame through which
the social world is routinely constructed" (van Dijk, 1988: 7).
To van Dijk, every
discourse implies construction and interpretation - processes that
don't occur in vacuum, with social dimensions of discourse interacting
with cognitive dimensions (van Dijk, 2004: 14-16).
This kind of cognitive critical approach
proposes a new conceptualisation of ideology, a concept that it can be
reconciled with the notion of the frame. Ideologies are social
representations shared by members of a group, allowing group members to
organize a multitude of social beliefs, for instance, what is good or
bad, right or wrong, fair or unfair, and so on.
They are presented almost as axioms of a
formal system, consisting of the more general and abstract social
beliefs that control or organize the more specific knowledge and
opinions (attitudes) of a group (Idem, 2003: 49), and are assumed to be
organized by mental and social group schema consisting of a number of
fundamental categories that codify the ways that self and others are
defined as members of the group (Idem, 2003: 151). This is particularly
visible in racist ideologies and their strategies of inclusion and
exclusion. Ideological opinions structure
many of the aspects of discourse, such as topic selection, lexical
choice, semantic moves as well as style and rhetoric. Ideologies first
of all control the formation of the mental models of the events we talk
about, that is,
the semantics of text and talk.
2
Van Dijk also built a model to the structural analysis of some dimensions of news discourse, defining as a major aim of CDA "to produce explicit and systematic descriptions of units of language use that we have called discourse" (van Dijk, 1988: 24). This model of description implies the use of some kind of macro-semantics, which deal with global meanings and allow us to describe the meanings of whole paragraphs, sections or chapters within discourse. Those macro-structures are characterized in terms of propositions, which van Dijk labels macro-propositions (1998: 32). The macro-structures consist of several macro-propositions, such as the topics or the summary of text; these topics relate each other in a hierarchal structure, defined by macro-rules. Macro-rules reduce information, deleting the details considered not relevant to the text, replacing a sequence of propositions for a more abstract generalization, or summary, of a sequence of propositions.
Here, van Dijk explicitly argues for a cognitive complement of the theory of macrostructures, which implies a clear reference to the analysis of frames (van Dijk, 1998: 34). In the building of discourse, there is a top down processing that must to be activated by frames that arise from the social knowledge of world. The cognitive element
frame will be expressed not only in the topic but also in all the choices that are going to be made in order to express the axiomatic rules presented in the described event.
However, in the news there are some semantic features - that is, the headline and lead - that give us the kernel of the frame, because of their high level of generalization and abstraction. This does not mean that the frame is not present in less general paragraphs or propositions concerning with details and specifications. The cognitive dimension of discourse and the presence of the frame, in my point of view, will be expressed in the particular kind of coherence that is maintained between the most abstract and the most concrete level.
In conjunction with macro-semantics there
are macro-syntactic structures that characterize the overall forms of
discourse, structures that van Dijk labels schemata or superstructures
(1988: 26). Many other types of texts also have a structure implying
schematic strategies -
that is, organizational patterns and conventional categories, such as
the various forms of opening or closing a discourse, specific narrative
conventions on. This overall syntax defines the possible forms in which
topics or themes can be inserted and ordered in the actual text. In
this particular case, news text has been object of attention by
narratology in what concerns the search of archetypal narrative
categories.
CDA also directs its
attention to the microstructures of news
discourse. Local semantics focuses on propositions, just as
macro-semantics deals with macro-propositions. Here, the strategic
demands of local coherence is such that the language user looks for the
possible connections among facts denoted by propositions. Frequently,
facts denoted in this way showed identical referents. Sequences of
propositions constitute discourse if they satisfy a number of coherence
conditions such as conditional relations between the facts denoted by
these sentences and functional relations (such as generalization,
specification, contrast) among sentences or propositions (van Dijk,
2003: 206). So, the second sentence may be used as an explanation of
the first sentence but it can also be a generalization, a specification
correction, or a contrast or an alternative to the first sentence.
In what we call a functional coherence, a
Proposition B has a specific function related to a previous proposition
A. There is also the case of conditional coherence, which is not based
on relations between propositions or sentences but on relations between
the facts denoted by those propositions or sentences. At the level of
local coherence we must have in mind the importance of presupposition
and implicature. In formal terms, a presupposition, q, is presupposed
by p if it will be implicit in p and not in - p. Any proposition
accepted by the speaker but that is not explicitly declared is a
presupposition (van Dijk, 1988: 64).
There are also stylistic and
rhetorical strategies. Style has to do with establishing connections
between discourse and the personal and social context of
parole - that is, "it's the result of choices made by the speaker among
optional variations in discourse forms that may be used to express more
or less the same meaning" (van Dijk, 1998: 27). It's a major
indication of the role performed by context, namely in specific social
situations: a courtroom, a classroom, a parliamentary speech, the
degree of familiarity with the listener, and so on. Style is always a
marker of social properties of speakers of the socio-cultural
situation of the speech event. In the case of news discourse, van Dijk
correctly points out that news discourse is a public discourse type
that presupposes a vast amount of generally shared knowledge, beliefs,
norms and values. News is in some ways impersonal because it is not
expressed by a single author but by an institution; style also accords
with the topic (e.g. the coverage of a pop concert will not be as
formal as the coverage of the signing of an international treaty) (van
Dijk, 1988: 76).
Finally, news discourse uses
rhetorical strategies to enhance the organization, the storage and the
retrieval of textual information by the listener or reader (van Dijk,
1998: 28). Such rhetorical strategies can
also enhance the appearance of truth and plausibility. News reports are
written in a way that implies a subtle claim from the hidden speaker:
"Believe me!" Hence rhetoric must enhance the factual nature of the
discourse, with the direct description of ongoing events, evidence of
close eyewitness and other reliable sources, signs that indicate
accuracy and exactness (such as number, names, places, hours, events)
and direct quotes from sources, especially when opinions are involved.
News rhetoric also needs to built a strong relational structure for
facts, such as referring to previous events as conditions and causes
and predicting next events as consequences; inserting facts in
well-known situation models that make them relatively familiar; using
well-known scripts, and concepts that belong to the script, and
trying to organize facts in well-known specific structures.
Finally, news discourse must also provide
information that has also attitudinal and emotional dimensions: showing
facts that involve strong emotions and present direct quotes of
different opinions coming from different ideological stances (van Dijk,
1998: 82-85).
The ideological role of the media: framing Carcavelos Beach
The contradictions and
perplexities of a society, characterized by differentiated attitudes
described in the sections above, came to light with an `attack by a
teen street gang' on Carcavelos Beach, allegedly perpetrated on the
Portuguese National Day (10 June 2005). According to the media, this
attack involved about 500 young Africans from the quarters (slums)
surrounding Lisbon. An `attack by teen street gang' is a possible
translation for the word
arrastão,
the name publicly given to the phenomenon, based on similar events in
Brazil.
In the afternoon of 10 June, Portuguese broadcasters opened their news
programmes with reports that an organized robbery of great dimensions
had taken place on Carcavelos Beach. According to RTP (Radio
Televisão Portuguesa): "In the beginning of the afternoon, groups of
30 to 50 young African boys, simultaneously and in apparently organized
actions, had assaulted and attacked the swimmers in different parts of
the beach." For SIC (Channel 3), a cinematographic metaphor was the
most adequate one: it was a "scene of a film"; for TVI (Channel 4),
the language was picked up from tabloids, describing "one afternoon of
terror and panic in Carcavelos".
TVI and SIC showed photos that allegedly show
the violence of the attack and the
modus
operandi that started with two gunshots.
According to RTP, the photos showed an amount of people caught by
surprise. For the
newspaper PUBLICO (11 June 2005), "half a thousand youths, between 12
and 20 years, advanced for the beach and, until the police arrived,
they stole what they wanted from swimmers who were enjoying the holiday
there." For the
Diario de
Notícias (
DN),
"the beach of Carcavelos was invaded by a wave of
thieves". According to
Correio da
Manhã (
CM,
11 June 2005) "The terror started when about 500 youngsters and girls,
organized in groups, started `to sweep' the beach of Carcavelos, where
there were thousands of people, stealing from and attacking however
they wanted. For a moment, the events recalled the `frequent attacks by
teen street gangs' on Brazilian beaches."
On the days that followed,
there was much speculation about a threat of attack by teen street
gangs on beaches of the Algarve and about the capacity of the GNR
(National Republican Guard) in annulling any new attempt. For example,
PÚBLICO (12 June 2005) claimed "the fear of group assaults arrives at
Quarteira". According to this periodical, "a group of fifty youths,
after one rave in a disco-house of Vilamoura, invaded the beach,
beginning panic between local swimmers and traders". The
DN (12 June 2005) told the same story: "Everything happened for 11 hours,
when about 50 youths, the majority youngsters, between 23 and 25 years
- many of whom were resident in the Bairro of Cova da Moura - after
spending the night in one rave party, close to Vilamoura, had provoked
a disturbance on the beach in the Town of Loulé, Algarve."
The photos showed by RTP, TVI and SIC, and on
the front pages of
CM,
DN and
Público,
didn't leave any doubts concerning the existence of an organized
action. The media then started to listen to experts. Rui Pereira,
Professor of Law, former director of Secret Information Service and
expert in security matters, was quoted saying "we cannot have any
complacency concerning this kind of incident". Moita Flores,
criminologist, told the RTP that the phenomenon was "a meeting of
gangs, similar to other well known occurrences on the Beaches of Rio de
Janeiro."
Barra da Costa, author of a book called
The Gang and The
School, informed the journalist Céu Neves
from
DN (11 June 2005) "We can talk about a typical anti-social reaction
coming from juvenile delinquents".
On the days that followed, newspapers
published all kinds of material on the subject: interviews with
political leaders presenting projects to increase the police presence
(
PÚBLICO,
12 June 2005;
DN, 12
June 2005), and news about the damage provoked in the tourism
(
CM12
June 2005).
The media strategy
Several certainties were consolidated on the
first day: there has been an
arrastão that mobilized hundreds of young people; the event provoked terror;
that the majority of youngsters were African; and the event was similar
to several to those occurred in Rio de Janeiro. These three facts -
the terror, the ethnic origin of the criminals and the similarity with
events of Rio de Janeiro - become very well established in the first
hours of the event. This means that we may identify a cognitive frame
that was established to understand reality. As an anthropologist,
Miguel Vale de Almeida, simply stated: "This was the
arrastão that Portuguese were looking for." This frame contains several
elements that drive the discursive macrostructures:
- Hundreds of youngsters launch panic in Carcavelos Beach, near Lisbon.
- They come from the slums of Lisbon, so are very likely to be black
people.
- They use the same modus operandi from black street kids from
the favelas in Rio.
With these dimensions, the news could inscribe the events within a very
well-known script.
The macrostructures of all the news discourse
on
arrastão were completely visible and emphasised these ideas. The semantic
macro-rules that expressed the main topic of the coverage were very
easy to understand when we look the extensive dossier of newspaper
reporting from the day after the event. The most general proposition is
provided by several headlines, for instance: "Terror on the Beach"
(
CM, 11
June
2005), and "Arrastão in Carcavelos
Beach"
(
DN, 11
June
2007). Following this, the leads were
completely assertive, closing down any chance of an alternative
description: "When the first thirteen policeman arrive at the beach,
they didn't want to believe their eyes"
(
CM, 11
June
2005). The description assumed (in direct
speech from the speaker, as if he was the police officer arriving at
the beach) that hundreds of thieves were running from one side of the
beach to the other. The police source said to
CM that,
while they were observing the situation, hundred of persons were
running to the officers present on the beach, telling them that the
thieves have stolen "mobiles, their power cables, everything"
(
CM, 11
June
2005). In the case of
DN,
"The panic appeared on Carcavelos Beach yesterday in the afternoon
when four hundred individuals, in gangs, suddenly started to assault
and attack the swimmers" (11 June 2005). The
DN report included a photo depicting members of the police and several
other people, some of them black and young, in such a way that it is
difficult to see the kind of action performed by the civilians: are
they running? Are they being pursued by the police? Are some of them
participating in a collective assault or are the just taking their bags
and chairs running from the confusion? The caption read: "Panic. The
police estimated that there were more than five hundred participants in
the assault, with ages between twelve and twenty. The officers have
fired shots into the air to frighten the youngsters". In
DN we
find a text-box, containing the following headline: "The act has to
have been prepared". In the text following this headline, there is the
statement of an expert, a criminologist, who gave a general opinion
about this kind of gang juvenile delinquency - that it involved
hungry persons from the slums - whilst the first page used an
inflammatory headline: "Brazilian arrastão arrives at Carcavelos"!
The leads in these articles were followed by
very similar descriptions (written in the present tense, as if we were
following live coverage) of policeman, armed with machine-guns,
surrounding and watching hundreds of black youngsters, and detailing
the development of the event
(
CM;
DN). It
was as if the established facts only existed to be commented upon; the
youngsters, referred to as marginals, were from the problematic slums
of Lisbon, especially from Chelas e Amadora, as the Mayor of Cascais,
António Capucho, explained to the newspapers
(
DN,
CM and
Público).
Another article
on the cover of
CM was given
the headline:
"Arrastão comes from Brazil". This kind
of angle was only a pretext to reinsure the
factuality of the descriptions, establishing a precedent that can be
useful to provide more details about "this kind of crime".
Two days after the event, a new event, also
located in the tourist zone of Algarve, was described as Arrastão,
but in this case "The GNR (National Republican Guard) stopped a wave
in Albufeira". In the same article
(
CM, 12
June 2005), there also appears the argument that this is organized
crime: Police have apparently identified "group leaderships". The
selective quotation of only experts and politicians is used in these
reports to present facts as they were already established. For
instance, one quoted businessman believed that with the
arrastão,
his tourism business is ruined
(
CM, 12
June 2005).
At the micro-level, and specifically
concerning local coherence, we can find in the coverage of this event
some significant functional connections among sentences - especially
with examples, specifications, generalizations, contrasts and so on.
Quotation and the use of witnesses can be viewed as specifications of
newspaper statements. They enhance, for example, sentences that make
strong references to lack of safety and the absence of policies. After
giving his statement - "They walk in groups and people were
afraid" - one eyewitness is described as holding his bag in his
hand, walking for his home. That description is used in the text as a
demonstration of his fear, running from the event he describes
(
CM, 12
June 2005).
The uses of implicature and presupposition are omnipresent in almost all
the texts: the references in both newspapers to the slums of Lisbon,
the comparisons with Rio de Janeiro, and the ideas that the slums of
Lisbon are both problematic and well known to the Police, implies a lot
of presumed shared knowledge about the kind of crime and the profile of
criminals. Without saying anything explicitly, the `ethnic problem' is
raised as the real issue.
In relation to style, there is an abundant use
of direct reportage, as if the reporter wants to take the reader to the
scene of the event. Local and human details powerfully strengthen this
strategy. The style is always colourful, assertive, with intensified
active verbs and substantives (the terror, as substantive identity).
Concerning rhetoric, the texts are particularly rich, exemplifying the
rhetoric of authenticity described by van Dijk: they make frequent and
specific use of numbers (five hundred), ages (between twelve and twenty
years) and the exact origins and neighbourhoods of the perpetrators.
They provide the exact number of police officers that were on the beach
when the events began (thirteen), the exact time that phone calls began
to be made to the Police Station (3.00p.m.), and also the exact
location of the bar that featured at the close of the event.
The amazing developments after this event
astonished the country, with the full
controversy relating to the `attack by teen street gang' arising a
little time after the events: On June 17th, the Metropolitan Commander
of the Lisbon PSP gave additional clarifications: first, that "of a
large group of 400 or 500 people, only 30 or 40 had practiced illicit
activities"; second that "many youths that had appeared on television
and in photographic images running in the beach of Carcavelos on that
day, were not assailants, but just ordinary young people that ran
away"; and third, that "the assaults were very small in number and
not the product of elaborate organization." On 21 June 2005, the High
Commissary for the Emigration and Ethnic Minorities lamented "the
enormous negative impact of the journalistic errors committed in the
covering of the events".
On
June 30th, the Office of Emigration released a documentary entitled
"Once Upon a Time ...an Arrastão" (Era uma vez um Arrastão),
produced by Diana Adringa, an RTP journalist and former-chair of the
Union of Journalists. The documentary included some interviews that
translated significant doubts on the existence of the attack. Later, on
July 7th, Diana Adringa interviewed the Metropolitan Commander of the
Lisbon PSP, who revealed that "an Arrastão did not happen" More
specifically, Oliveira Pereira said he "already knew this about one
hour later. However, when I wanted to communicate this, to clarify the
official notice, it was very difficult."
On July 19th, the PSP finally formally
denied the existence of any attack by teen street gangs on Carcavelos
Beach, in a report presented to the Constitutional Commission of Civil
Rights and Freedoms.
According with BBC (quoted by on-line
journal
Portugal
Diário, 18 June 2005), after the
Arrastão, nationalists made their greatest protest since the
re-establishment of democracy in 1974. "More than five hundred
persons demonstrated by the centre of Lisbon asking for the end of
crimes and expulsion of illegal emigrants"
The media accepted the presupposed existence
of an
arrastão that caused revolt among the population, and accepted the connection
between immigration and crime. After this
event, nationalists have given a large number of interviews to the
national media, appearing on Television programmes and in newspapers.
In March 2007, the President of the National Renovation Party was
interviewed by
Diário de
Notícias, after the organisation of an
outdoor event in the Marquês de Pombal Square that called for no more
immigrants to Portugal. The leader emphasised the economic sacrifice
made by nationalists in hosting this event: "It's the only one. The
event in Marquês de Pombal Square has cost 1750 Euros, from start to
end, and there is not enough money for more. It was paid for with
donations from militants, because PNR it is not a rich party. We have
chosen a central point of Lisbon, with lots of visibility, because it's
an issue that any other party in Portugal has the courage of pointing
out. We are being invaded."
New angles to emigration
After the
arrastão,
several incidents, including the nationalist demonstrations, began to
show a change of mood in Portuguese public opinion concerning the ways
it related itself to "strangers" and "foreigners". This article has
not offered a definitive analysis of these
texts, and has worked instead in a more exemplified style in order to
draw some general insights. We feel it is necessary to launch a
programme of research with journalism studies, drawing on the
contribution of Critical Discourse Analysis, Social Phenomenology,
Social Psychology and Theory of Communication. As part of this
research, we feel that some hypotheses must be tested and studied.
Among them we emphasise the following:
-
a) The media are powerful ideological institutions that allow people to
share social beliefs. In this narrow sense, they turn ideology into
common sense to be shared by average people and vice-versa.
-
b) Ideologies are systems of beliefs about identity - that is to say
they employ criteria of inclusion and exclusion in social groups.
Racism and nationalism are strongly persuasive when they relate closely
to everyday-life, exploiting the apparitions and anxieties of
ordinary people. Hence, ideology must also be studied as a cognitive
phenomenon.
-
c) Frames must also be studied as cognitive phenomena, rooted in
everyday life through communicative interaction. Their study must be
coupled with the study of ideology in order to study the up-down
movement of cognitive processing of social data.
-
d) The articulation between these two levels of cognitive phenomena has
political consequences concerning the relationships between the system
and life-world.
-
e) In turn, this has methodological consequences, because it requires an
integration of ethnographic methods and discourse analysis.
-
f) Finally, this methodological approach may open to us up to a way of
making the bridge between cognitive processes and discourse at
journalistic level.
The conclusions above, provide productive working arguments to examine
in research projects on the Critical Study of Journalism, taking into
account the need for further theoretical and methodological
developments to the understand the new phenomena of online journalism.
References
Bateson, Gegory, (2000) A Theory on Play and
Fantasy in Steps to an ecology of mind, The Chicago
University Press.
-
Correia, João Carlos (2005) A Teoria da Comunicação de Alfred
Schutz, Lisboa, Livros Horzonte.
-
Gitlin, Todd.
(1980) The Whole World is Watching
Berkeley, University of California Press.
-
Goffman, Erving (1986) Frame Analysis, Boston , Northeasthern University
Press,
-
Klapper, Joseph T. (1960) The Effects of mass communication, New York ,
The Free Press.
-
Lippmann, Walter, Public Opinion
available at: http://www.the-wow-collec
tion.com/software/pbpnn.pdf)
-
Oliveira Marques, António (1986)
História de
Portugal, III Vol., Lisboa, Paulas.
-
Pedro, Emília Ribeiro (1997) Análise crítica do
discurso: aspectos teóricos, metodológicos e
analíticos in Emília Ribeiro Pedro (Org.),
Análise Crítica do Discurso, Lisboa, Caminho.
-
Pinto, António Costa
(2002) Portugal and European integration: an introduction.
Text available: http://ies.berkeley.edu/research/files/ CP02/CP02-Port_Euro_Integration.pdf (consulted 9 June 2007).
-
Pinto, António Costa & Teixeira, Nuno
Severiano (2004) From Atlantic past to
European destiny of Portugal, in Wolfram
Kaiser and Jurgen Elvert (eds.), European Union
Enlargement. London and New York:
Routledge, pp.112-130, available at: http://www.ics. ul.pt/corpocientifico/
antoniocostapinto/pdf/08chap6.pdf (consulted 22 June 2007).
-
Santos, Boaventura Sousa (1994)
Pela Mão de
Alice: o Social e
o Político na Pós-Modernidade, Lisboa,
Afrontamento.
-
Schutz, Alfred & Luckmann, Thomas
(1973) The structures of the life-world, Volume 1, Evanston, IL:
Northwestern University
Press.
-
Schutz, Alfred (1976)
Collected papers: studies in social
theory, Vol. II, The Hague, Martinus
Nijhoff.
-
Schutz, Alfred (1975) Collected Papers III, The Hague, Martinus Nijjoff,
1975.
-
Van Dijk, Teun (1988) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
-
Van Dijk, Teun (2003) Ideology: a multidisciplinary approach London,
Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, Sage Publishers.
-
Van Dijk, Teun (2004) Cognição, discurso e interacção, São
Paulo, Contexto.
-
Whorf, Benjamin Lee (1956)
Language, Thought, and
Reality. John B. Carroll (Ed.) M.I.T.
Press.
Footnotes:
1http://www.doceo.co.uk/tools/frame.htm#WHORF
2Of course ideologies are not idealistically defined only in cognitive
terms but also in terms of social groups and institutions. (Cfr. Van
Dijk, 2003: 18-27). "Thus, if ideologies are belief systems, we need
to be a little more specific and say that they are social beliefs
systems (Van Dijk, 2003: 29).